Approach
A method built to leave you self-sufficient.
One accountable principal, me, working at the cadence your business needs: understanding the commercial goal, making the technical calls, governing the risk, and drawing on the bench to get the work shipped.
Diagnose
A fast, honest read from me on where you are: the technology, the team, the roadmap and the commercial goals it all serves. No engagement starts until we both understand the real problem.
Prioritise
Not everything matters equally. I rank the moves by impact and effort, so the first thing we do is the thing that shifts your numbers, including where AI and automation earn their place.
Ship
Strategy that never ships is theatre. The work runs embedded with your team under my governance (the right execution lead from the bench, leading and building) so momentum is real and visible from week one.
Systemise
The goal is to leave you stronger than I found you: documented decisions, capable people, and systems that run without us. Dependency is a failure mode, not a business model.
Fractional cadence
The same accountability, right-sized.
The time commitment flexes with the stage and mandate. The service does not fragment into disconnected projects.
Strategic cadence
A light fractional CTO cadence for leadership teams that need recurring decisions, challenge and oversight, with a named person accountable.
Embedded cadence
I work inside the business: setting AI-first strategy, governing delivery and owning outcomes end-to-end, with the right execution lead from the bench alongside.
Transition cadence
Focused leadership through a critical transition (a new platform, funding round, team reset or permanent CTO hire) with a clear handover point.
What level of CTO support fits?
Tell me where the business is heading and where technology is getting in the way. I’ll suggest the lightest cadence that creates real accountability.